Review: The Thing (1982)


That is one nasty thing, and trust me, I have never been told that in my own life, at least I don’t think I have!

Screenplay By: Bill Lancaster
Directed By: John Carpenter

John Carpenter is a master of minimalist horror and science fiction. The man behind such works as Halloween and They Live would have to be. The Thing is another excellent minimalist effort from Carpenter. It is a horror science fiction yarn, it is tight, taught and claustrophobic. The music, the actors, the setting, the camera work and the effects combine to create an intriguing and closed off atmosphere. While we can’t relate to an alien space creature killing people or mimicking them, we can relate to the feeling of being stranded with the walls closing in on us.

Kurt Russell is a man’s man, so is Keith David for that matter. A major complaint lobbied against The Thing is its lack of characterization, but The Thing isn’t about the characters or getting to know those characters. The Thing is all about a group of men trapped in a lose-lose situation where they have no idea what is going on or what will come next. Unsuspecting faces are necessary to compliment guys like David and Russell who are required to be bad asses in the face of adversity. But, there is a difference in their heroes, they aren’t idiots. In a lot of ways Russell’s MacReady is a precursor to John McClane from Die Hard. Yes, he is a bad ass, but he also thinks and comes up with solutions that involve more than muscle.

The major drawing factor in The Thing for me was the air of doubt surrounding the entire film, and the excellent effects. Carpenter himself does a great job of creating doubt before anything has gone awry, we know that something is up with that dog, but it’s also just a dog so there’s that voice in the back of your head telling you that the dog is distracting you from the real danger. After the alien makes its presence known and we learn of its “powers” The Thing becomes not a whodunit, but a who is who. We don’t know who is a mimic, and truly at any moment any character could have been a mimic. This is aided by the effects employed by the gore masters of this film, the alien is freaky and gnarly. In every incarnation the alien is an apparition to behold, an assault upon our sensibilities.

The Thing has taken a place in history as one of Carpenter’s best works and as one of the best science fiction films ever. While I did have a few minor problems with some logic gaps and some easy outs that were given to the characters, I would have to agree with The Thing’s place in history. It is a tremendous science fiction story, and a taut suspense horror film. The Thing is a lesson to all young sci-fi/horror filmmakers out there who want to see how to actually make a small movie that works, and what a lesson it is.




10 responses to “Review: The Thing (1982)

  1. LOVE THIS FILM!!!!!! its on now actually, remember it screwing me up night after night as a kid not bein able to sleep XD
    was the dog part was what got me, bein a lover ov dogs. well freaked me out!!!
    but yeah, the whole claustrophobic sensation it portrays makes it total genius!!! 😀

  2. Pingback: Man, I Love Films – MOTM/LAMBCAST #71: THE THING

  3. Pingback: Movie of the Month/LAMBcast #71: The Thing |

  4. Pingback: Postulating & Pontificating: Your Taste Is Unacceptable! | Bill's Movie Emporium

  5. Pingback: Postulating & Pontificating: Horror Bonanza! | Bill's Movie Emporium

  6. Pingback: The Large Association of Movie Blogs | Movie of the Month/LAMBcast #71: The Thing

  7. As a dog lover the dog scene gets to me every time, I feel your pain.

  8. I say the Director JOHN CARPENTER and the Special Makeup Creature Effects ROB BOTTIN did the best genius work on this 1982 sequel… “THE THING.” I hope there will be several of other new directors and dozens of other new tatented special makeup effects artists who soon are going to make twenty new “The Thing” sequels, and will be as scary and horrifying as the one John Carpenter did back in the early 80’s.

  9. I was thinking that if they’re going to make twenty new sequels, they should have the way the new Special Makeup Effects Artists do sixty of makeup bladder-FX to specialist bladder-FX to do thirty of creepy monster transformations, sixty creature puppetry FX, and even do a short monster stop-motion FX. That would be a awesome idea for the new sequels.

  10. Unfortunately Eddie we did get a sort of prequel last year, that wasn’t that well received. There’s also the issue of special effects no longer being of the practical variety that Bottin was so good at.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s