Disney Animated Marathon: The Rescuers (1977)

Movie #24 in the Disney Animated Marathon features an awesome cat, an albatross, and something that’s supposed to be a lady!

Story By: Ken Anderson, Ted Berman, Larry Clemmons, Vance Gerry, Fred Lucky, Burny Mattinson, David Michener, Dick Sebast & Frank Thomas
Directed By: John Lounsbery, Wolfgang Reitherman & Art Stevens

It’s too bad I’ve used my “I’m having trouble thinking of what to say” opening so many times because it would be the perfect bridge for my discussion on The Rescuers. My thoughts are flowing freely, don’t get me wrong, but I wasn’t able to find the same type of cognizance in The Rescuers. The simplest, easiest and most honest complaint I can levy towards The Rescuers is that this is a film that is unsure of what it wants to be. It’s a product of its age, The Rescuers screams 1970’s throughout, but it’s also trapped in-between eras. It’s as if Wolfgang Reitherman and company were afraid to break away from the standard happy woodland animals Disney setting for a more modern approach, but still made some misguided attempt to do as such. The result is a film that is perpetually switching between two different approaches, and while it fails at meshing the two stylistic approaches together it also fails at capturing the essence of either the modern or the classic in any way.

As characters go The Rescuers doesn’t have much to offer, Bernard and Miss Bianca could have been delightful characters but we aren’t allowed to spend a lot of time with them. They are on screen a lot, but they are rarely doing anything and it’s criminal that their interactions are kept to such a small number because I thought the film soared highest when they were interacting with one another. There are also the characters of Evinrude, Orville and Rufus, all of which were fine characters but again we didn’t spend enough time with them. I’m not a cat person by any means, but Rufus owned, yet sadly he was here and gone as fast as the movie could move him out. Perhaps the characters could have been given more time to shine by cutting out the three, I think it was three, highly forgettable songs laced throughout The Rescuers. I know that Disney animated features are, ahem, known for their song and dance numbers, but the ones found in The Rescuers didn’t just lack inspiration, they were, well, I don’t want to sound mean, but, pathetic.

I know I’ve been awfully harsh to The Rescuers, it is a film that Dave Kehr and others think of as the golden nugget among the rather pedestrian Disney animated offerings of the ’70 and early ’80’s. Then again Kehr and others of his ilk dismissed the awesomeness of Robin Hood, so their take is one I disagree with already. When I think about The Rescuers I have a hard time thinking of what worked for me, instead my mind immediately shoehorns in on what didn’t work. Whether that is Madame Medusa, the songs, the far too plain animation or something else, no matter how hard I try my thoughts come back to the negatives of The Rescuers. I can safely say that The Rescuers is one film in this marathon that I was already forgetting mere moments after it was over, and that’s never something I want to say about a Disney animated feature.

Rating:

**1/2

Cheers,
Bill

Advertisements

6 responses to “Disney Animated Marathon: The Rescuers (1977)

  1. What a shame you weren’t able to capture the amazing degree of beauty this delightful Disney animated classic offers… but then again, you used “Robin Hood” (1973) and “awesomeness” in the same sentence, so you couldn’t expect much.

  2. Your last line just makes me yawn, you want to try and bash, then come with something stronger than that…

  3. ^My thoughts exactly about the review as a whole.

  4. Yes, because well reasoned arguments are the same as bashing. I know I’m just shouting to the wind when I say this, but if you are going to prance onto the blog of someone else and attack their opinion then you need to be able to back up what you say. You haven’t, thus you come across like a time wasting troll and a dullard.

  5. I could very well counter-attack each and everyone of your points, and I’ve already done so on many occasions on significant sites. I wouldn’t find it particularly a good use of my time to elaborate on a blog that few people will read.

  6. Obviously you read the blog, since you’ve commented before. So is it then that you get your jollies by trolling? Because if so you’d attract much more attention at one of those blogs that many people will read.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s